Our investigation
In examining how the bank handled their hardship application, we found the bank properly assessed it and provided clear information and explanations regarding relevant considerations and the outcome.
We reviewed the calls and correspondence about the 12-week repayment plan. Rory said the plan was misleading because it did not lead to approval of a loan increase to cover the overdraft. But the calls showed the bank repeatedly explained that a separate lending assessment would still be required at the end of the plan. It also said it would consider affordability, account conduct and equity, adding that approval was not guaranteed.
In looking at the bank’s communication with Rory and Declan, we noted failures including inconsistency in its contact with the pair, and confusion about which team was handling the matter. In addition, it referred Rory for a further home loan assessment that did not appear to be warranted. The bank had recognised these failings and had been refunding the monthly overdraft interest on the joint account from August 2025.
Outcome
Rory withdrew his complaint.
Print this page