The bank recovered $6,400 but declined to reimburse the remaining loss. Vaughn said the bank should have identified the later payments as suspicious, warned him about the scam, or intervened before the payments were processed.
Our investigation
The bank’s records showed it blocked Vaughn’s card, contacted him and kept the card blocked until the bank spoke to him. This prevented any further card transactions.
As for the internet banking payments the following day, these were made using Vaughn’s usual device and banking credentials, and the money went into New Zealand bank accounts. The transactions did not involve a cryptocurrency provider. In such circumstances, the bank was not aware of the possibility the payments were part of a scam.
The bank acted promptly once told of the scam and referred the matter to its fraud team. It also stopped activity on the recipient account that happened to be with the bank, contacted the other bank involved, and tried to retrieve the card transaction amounts. We found the bank took reasonable steps to try to recover Vaughn’s money. Those efforts resulted in the recovery of $6,400.
Outcome
We did not uphold Vaughn’s complaint.
Print this page