Our investigation
The email closely resembled a legitimate message from the department and referred to a type of communication that a person could reasonably expect to receive. We were satisfied it was reasonable for Natalie to believe she was dealing with the department when she clicked the link.
The website also closely imitated the department’s site. We considered the bank had not shown that Natalie failed to take reasonable care by entering her banking details into the website. Natalie reasonably believed she was interacting with a legitimate organisation.
The scammer was able to set up mobile banking by using Natalie’s login details and by answering a security question. After creating a mobile banking PIN, the scammer could continue accessing the account without further authentication. Natalie had never previously used mobile banking.
The bank agreed to reimburse Natalie her loss and rounded the amount up to $11,000.
Outcome
Natalie accepted the bank's offer.
Print this page